As the city administration transitions to a second term, we are witnessing the departure of several longstanding employees whose time in public service has matured to retirement age. Recently, the …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
|
As the city administration transitions to a second term, we are witnessing the departure of several longstanding employees whose time in public service has matured to retirement age. Recently, the 32-year-tenured electrical inspector and a long-standing zoning and building inspector retired. Such departures cause the loss of extensive experience and institutional memory. I believe the city also continues to search for a permanent public works director and city engineer.
The nexus between filling these important administrative positions and the city’s economic development efforts is self-evident. Companies looking to locate or expand want to experience a smooth permitting process. Homeowners who are looking to build or renovate their residences want a timely review for their projects. I am sure the city will do its best in the short term with the sharing of job responsibilities and using external consultants on an as-needed basis.
The city also saw the city planning director leave his post last week after a 20-year career. I note the new president of the Planning Commission appears to be taking a non-traditional and more activist role in the Planning Department. Under state law, the head of the Planning Commission can serve as an administrative officer. However, in my opinion, Cranston should move with dispatch to find a new planning director who meets the city Charter requirements. I have witnessed six planning directors who oversaw the day-to-day planning role and supervised the career planning staff. That formula has seen Cranston emerge as an award-winning and well-respected community.
The administration and City Council should look carefully at the salary structures for such key posts to ensure that Cranston’s pay scales reflect the importance of these critical positions to attract qualified professionals. I understand this must always be considered in the context of challenging budget decisions.
A $323-million municipal corporation has to offer competitive salaries to attract the best-qualified candidates who want to be a part of Cranston’s next evolution of growth and sustainability.
Robert D. Murray is a local attorney and a former director of administration for the City of Cranston.
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here