Report Inappropriate Comments

let's say that you guys' attacks on Cote are all true (they are not ALL true), how does that disprove the city finances issues he alleges? You'll talk about anything BUT the numbers... which, in my mind as a "neutral", just simply proves to many readers that Cote at least very probably right on whats important here, the contracts, numbers, and their effect on all of our city taxes.

You all really should have kept to the high road and presented your own numbers that we can afford the obligations and taxes wont be unfairly raised, or worse. Can you stop name calling do that?

And trying to get a decent, honest citizen to lose his job simply because he questioned the affordability to the taxpayers of city contracts paints all city workers in a bad light. And thats not fair to the majority who are hard working and would never attack democracy in such a way.

As to Cote's past actions, how many of you have things in your past (that have nothing to do with the numbers and city finance issues)?

Lets all keep to the issue. (But, you wont)