Report Inappropriate Comments

I love it that one of the commenters on here is the self-same person whose disingenuous arguments were put by him to the School Committee in April 2011 and largely used by them in their ill-fated and costly defense of the "prayer banner". You know, this totally secular, not at all Christian, historical artifact that only a crazed liberal activist judge could possibly order removed and that would cost the City of Cranston little if nothing because the ACLU couldn't recover its legal costs. The same person who is urging us, with his snappy, 45 second advertisements to go out and spend maybe another $100,000 or so on top of the the likely $50,000 already wasted from the school budget, that in all probability will not go to benefit the city's kids education because he thinks it would be better trying to defend the words "Our Heavenly Father" with tax dollars rather than his own. You know, the person showing us all, as clearly as day, that the whole thing is entangled with religion, making it easy peasy for a judge to just shrug and say "appeal dismissed". Oh, and to make the whole thing binding on not just Rhode Island, but the whole of the First Circuit. Smart.

From: Should Cranston appeal Judge Lagueux's decision on the prayer banner at Cranston West?

Please explain the inappropriate content below.