Report Inappropriate Comments

It is no business of the courts to say that what is a religious practice or activity for one group is not a religion under the protection of the First Amendment.

“the Establishment Clause does prohibit state establishments, it is necessary then to know what would constitute such an establishment. Justice Thomas supposes that the clause means no coercion of religious belief or practice "by force of law and threat of penalty." The state may not force the removal of the banner at Cranston West on the behalf preferring atheists. The blank wall that remains supports "non religion" or atheism. This is unconstitutional.

From: Should Cranston appeal Judge Lagueux's decision on the prayer banner at Cranston West?

Please explain the inappropriate content below.