Report Inappropriate Comments

The students could say the state is forcing "non religion" or atheism in this case. Quoted from a US Supreme Court decision: "To be sure, such an affirmation is not a prayer, and I admit that this might be a significant distinction. But the Court has squarely held that the government cannot require a person to "declare his belief in God." Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488, 489, 6 L. Ed. 2d 982, 81 S. Ct. 1680 (1961); id., at 495, 6 L. Ed. 2d 982, 81 S. Ct. 1680 ("We repeat and again reaffirm that neither a State nor the Federal Government can constitutionally force a person 'to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion'")

From: Should Cranston appeal Judge Lagueux's decision on the prayer banner at Cranston West?

Please explain the inappropriate content below.